For full functionality of this site it is necessary to enable JavaScript. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your web browser. If you are visiting our website from a mobile device you will not be redirected to our mobile website without javascript enabled. Here are the instructions how to enable JavaScript in your phone. Thanks

Chandler

(803) 644-5335
103
Waterloo St. SW.
Aiken, SC 29801

CfromChandler

chandlerline

lawfirmPA

Personal Injury n Criminal Defense n Wrongful Death
Automobile & Tractor Trailer Accidents
n Workers' Compensation

viewourcommercialbutton

Everett K. Chandler, Esq.
Attorney and Counseler at Law

chandlerline1

lawfirmpa

Personal Injury n Criminal Defense n Wrongful Death
Automobile & Tractor Trailer Accidents
n Workers' Compensation

Can a defendant be acquitted if he or she was on drugs when the crime was committed?

Defendants who commit crimes under the influence of drugs sometimes argue that their mental functioning was so impaired that they should not be held accountable for their conduct. Generally, however, voluntary impairment does not excuse criminal conduct, since people know or should know that drugs affect mental functioning, and they should therefore be held legally responsible if they commit crimes as a result of their voluntary use. An exception to this rule may exist in cases involving a crime that requires "specific intent," in which the offender must have intended the precise result that occurred but arguably could not have formed that intent in his or her drugged state.